Do You Think “Gandhi” Was A Hero Of
our freedom ? He Is One Who Made us free ? Does He really Deserve
respect And Honor We Pay Him ? We Wouldn't Have Got Freedom By
Following “Gandhi”.
Disclaimer
:- this Note Has Nothing To Do With Anna Hazare's protest And I Am
not Writing Against Non-Violence Method.
Gandhi Is A name In India Which A Small
Children Comes To know By his Educational Books In Our History
Perhaps In Our Present To. Everyone Has Been told That He Is “Father
Of Nation”, He Is One who Made our Country Free, He Is Respected
As Mahatma. But Do He Really deserve All These Tags ? He Is known For
Making “Non Violence” And “Truth” As his Major Pillars For
Fighting But Did He Justifies Them ? He Always Known For his Service
Towards Nation And his Scarifies For The Country. In Short You can
Say Aim Of His Life Was To “Make India Free”(I hope You Also
Think So).But Can Anyone Get freedom By his Ways And Means ?
We cannot get freedom By his Ways
Non Co-operation Movement
Gandhi Started
Many protest Or Revolutions. One Famous Was “Non-Cooperation” to
British Govt.
it Was Taken
Back By Him After a Violence In Chauri Chuara. Where Police lathi
Charged On Innocent people who Were protesting And then in anger
people Burned Police Station. Now Think From British Point Of View Or
Think You Were Ruling Somewhere And One Person Like Him Stands
Against you With “Non Violence”. You Know That He will Do protest
And You Can Easily Kill 10-15 Peoples Of His country And Of course
Police Of The Same Country Will kill Them. Police Men Would Be A
Person of That Country Only. So Police will Kill Some Of their People
And Vice-Versa. And Finally The Man Will Withdraw His Protest. So How
Much Easy It Is To Defeat His Protest As Well As Reducing People Who
Support Him. They Would Killed All Of Us In Every protest no Protest
Would Have Been Successful. Just imagine If Hitler Was There In
place of British Govt. Then ?
His Impractical Dealing And Ways
I Hope Everyone
Agrees That He Was Rigid In follwing His Values And Teachings After
All This Is Only Excuse Given By Him For not Saving Bhagat Singh That
He Can Not Support Non Violence Or In other words He Will Stay With
His Values Only.
His Saying And
Dealings Were Impractical .
- He Himself Said “If Someone Slaps You On One Side Provide Him The other Side Of your Face And Ask to Slap”. First Of All Whomsoever Call Him Self A Gandhian Ask Yourself Is It A Practical Way ? Even if You Think It Is Practical I Would Love To Show you Its Application . Consider A Rapist Who Raped A Girl And Now Acc To Gandhi The Girl Sholud Ask him To Rape Again From Other Side. ? And If This Happened Rapist Will become happiest person Of world And More Than Half Man Will become Rapist.
- While Someone Is Trying To Rape Your Mother And Mole stating Her What You will Do Will You sit On Protest ? Will You Say Them Yes I will oppose You by Non Violence You Can Do What You Want. I hope Everyone Know British People Were Raping Our Motherland. And Gandhi Did A Non Violent Protest.Even No one In World Opted This Method For Freedom Struggle While Their Were Other Methods And Persons Whom Methods were Adopted Like “Karl Marx”. Undoubtedly Almost Everyone Love Non Violence But No One apply It In Fighting.
Doubtful Intentions
Many People In
India Only criticized Gandhi Because Of His Doubtful Intentions. And
I Am One Of Them For Sure. If You think Ge Was Really A Man Who Was
Serving Nation Why He Always Get criticized? Have You Ever Seen
Someone Criticizing Dr APJ Abdul Kalam ? Bhagat Singh ? Lala Lajpat
Rai ? And Many More. No One Doubted Their Love And Contribution
Towards Country. But In case Of Gandhi People Openly blamed Him That
He Is Fighting To Come In Power And Many More Blames And They Are
Also. If You See His One Of protest.
Dominance Status
Dominion
Status(Half Rule) It Was An Creation Of Gandhi. Which Says “British
Will Leave India And Appoint Indian At Top And British Will Look From
Their And Everything will be In Their Surveillance” In Short
British Will Hire Some Indians To rule For Them. Which Clearly
Indicates That The Movement Is For getting Power It Was Understood If
It would Have Happened He Or Anyone Top Leader Of INC Would Have
Been Ruling India As A Dog Of British people Because We Would Have
Been Still Slave.
One Amzing Thing
I would Like To tell you That On Asking From A Gandhian About This
half Rule See What He Said : “India Was Not in Condition To Take
Full freedom. We Were Not Able To Live On Our own”
Just To Save Gandhi He Threw Whole Nation in Ditch. I Want To Mention Some facts. This Was Around 1920 When He Started this Movement...At That tym The Hindu muslim Riots Were Not Their. We Have Had Many other And True Revolutionaries Alive At That time. And In 1947 You can see The Scale Of Riots The Country Was Divided And Thousands of People Were Killed. In Such Harsh Condition We Were Able To live On our Own And You Talking About When Condition Was Better. ?
Just To Save Gandhi He Threw Whole Nation in Ditch. I Want To Mention Some facts. This Was Around 1920 When He Started this Movement...At That tym The Hindu muslim Riots Were Not Their. We Have Had Many other And True Revolutionaries Alive At That time. And In 1947 You can see The Scale Of Riots The Country Was Divided And Thousands of People Were Killed. In Such Harsh Condition We Were Able To live On our Own And You Talking About When Condition Was Better. ?
In Non
Cooperation Movement lakhs Of School Children Burned thr Bags And
books For Boycott Of British Govt. And When He Withdrew the Movement
They Were Not Given Admission Anywhere By Govt. . If Gandhi was
Really Doing All For Society Why He Didn't Even Showed His Concerned
About Them ? Lala Laj pat Rai made National College For Such
Students.
How Come A
Revolutionaries Self Ideology Or Thoughts Became Bigger Than
Country's Freedom ?
It Is Being Said
And True Also If He Can Save Bhagat Singh. But He Didn't WHY ?? On
Asking Many Gandhian I Got Some Diff Replies I Will Adress all One By
One.
- A Man Said He Was Totally On his Non Violence Side how Can he support Bhagat ?So my Question rises Here Only how Came His Own Mind Made beliefs Became Bigger Than Our Freedom ? He Himself Have Admired Bhagat Singh's Patriotism. And It Is Clear To Him And Everyone Bhagat Singh Was Fight For Freedom Only No one Can Doubt On it. And It Is An Bare Fact If Bhagat Singh Would Have Survived Some More Years India Would Have Got Free Much Earlier. Even After knowing This All He Didn't Saved Him Just Because He Was Fighting From Different method I.e Self Defence ? The Man(Gandhi) Who Claimed His Life Is dedicated To country's Freedom But Still He Never Justified It.Even If A Non Violent Person Saves A Person Like Bhagat Singh That never Means He Is Compromising His Values. I Will explain this Later.
- One Said It Was Not In His Hand ?WTF ? Are You kidding me ? One Side You Say Only he Was Able To Remove British From India Other Side You Yourself Say He Was not Even Able To Save Bhagat Singh ?Gandhi had managed to have 90,000 political prisoners who were not members of his Satyagraha movement released under the Gandhi-Irwin Pact. :-From WikipediaAt-least 10% of them Would Be Violent Criminals How Came he Supported Them ?And Can Any One Deny Some Facts ? That At That Point Of Time If Some One Had power In His Hand He Was Gandhi...Someone Who Represented Us While Talking To British Was Gandhi...Someone Who Could Have Done Something He Was Gandhi...He Never Did That Because If Bhagat Singh Would Have Survived He Will never Got Powers And Status That He Enjoys Right Now.
Did He Really Followed Path Of
Truth ?
Gandhian Says
Bhagat Singh Was Violent And All. Leave This Thing A Side. Just tell
Me Why Gandhi Havn't Raised His Voice Against trial Of Bhagat Singh
As It Was ill Inconvenienced. It Was A Death penality Imposed By
British People To Him Without His Presence In Court room And Without
Giving him A Chance To Defend Him Self. It Was Totally injustice And
Being A Lawyer Gandhi Would Be Knowing This Much Better Then Why he
Never Asked British To Do Justice ? Why He Didn't Supported This
Truth ? Why A Man Who Always Said He Supports Truth Was Absent Here ?
Isn't He Did What Rahul Gandhi Do Now A Days ?
Sacrifices
I Don't Know
Exactly That He Did Any Sacrifice For Country Or Not. Perhaps He
Never. What Soever He Did Was For Getting in To Power. He Was
Married And Had 4 Sons i.e He Enjoyed Affection,Sex And All These
Things. He enjoyed Studying In Foreign Even Now A Days Its Very Big
And Rare Thing Think About That Time. He Lived But His Supporters
Died In movements.
When Gandhi was
16 his father became very ill. Being very devoted to his parents, he
attended to his father at all times during his illness. However, one
night, Gandhi's uncle came to relieve Gandhi for a while. Gandhi
retired to his bedroom and had sex with his wife. Shortly afterward a
servant came to report that Gandhi's father had just died. Gandhi
felt tremendous guilt and never could forgive himself. He came to
refer to this event as "double shame." The incident had
significant influence in Gandhi becoming celibate
at the age of 36, while still married.(From wikipedia)
Now I want to
Ask 2 things
1 if Someone
Left Doing Sex In Frustration Of His father's Death (I hope It Is
Clear From Above Paragraph) How Does this Show A good Moral character
? Or even An Integral Character ? And See how Much he was In to Sex.
2 He Had 4 Sons
But How Came ? He Married At Age Of 13 And In 16 he Left Sex. Still
he Had 4 Sons ?
Who
Contributed More ?
A Men Died By
Lathi Charging Of Police I Hope You At Least Remember His Name Lala
Lajpat Rai. He Was Also Doing Peaceful Protest Against Simon
Commission. But Beaten By Police For His Protest. Ram Parsad Bismil
Ji Who Died Fighting In Fighting With policemen. Bhagat Singh, Raj
Guru, Sukhdev Who Were Hanged For Their Fight And Died Happily For
Nation. Subhash Chandra Bose Who Made Azad Hind Fauj And Who Fight In
Reality And Made India Free. He Died in Mysterious Circumstances. And
Apart From Them Thr Was A Man Who Never Faced What They Have Faced
And Lived A Better Life. And Still People Think He Contributed More ?
Self Defence Is Not Violence
''Violence is
when you use force to exploit people, to oppress them'' ''The fight
for one's life, for
dignity, for
rights...'' is not violence. lt is self-defence! :- Bhagat Singh
The Method Opted
By Bhagat Singh Was Self Defence Not Violence. He Named His Party
From HRA TO HSRA(Hindustan_Socialist_Republican_Association).
Just Read Their idology And See The Diff B/W Self Defence And
Violence. He Was Born For Society And Died For Same. He Never Said To
Kill innocent Yeah But To Fight Against injustice Of British And
Fight For Our Own Right. A Fight For Our Freedom. He Did Same What
Now Our Armed Forces Do Self Defence Are They Also Violent People ??
Violent People are Terrorist Not Those who Are Countering Them To
Save Their Nation. So He Was never A Violent Person He Was The One
Who Was fighting For Peace By Countering Violent Person . If Someone
Came And Start Abusing You or Slap You What You Will Do ? You Will
defend Him Or Hit him Back Or ll Catch His Hand... So Are You Violent
?
If
You See The Trial Period Of Bhagat Singh He Was In jail For 2 Years
And Recently The Hindu Published An Article About Him In Which It Was
Said
“The
total period of hunger strikes observed during his nearly two-year
incarceration Of Bhagat Singh becomes about five months. Probably
this is more than the total period of Mahatma Gandhi's hunger strikes
during his prolonged political career starting from South Africa.”
A Men Doing Fast
Unto death In Jail For Raising The Indian Status And The Method Was
Truly Non Violent If He Was Violent man He Would Have Beaten Some Eng
Policemen But He Never Did. And Again See What Ever He Did He Did On
His Own Shoulders. He Never Asked Any Other Prisoner To Do So While
Gandhi Would Have Said Come With Me Do Fast. If You Still Think He
Was A Violent Man No One Can Help You. So Now He Was Not A Violent
Man Plus In his Trial It Was Totally injustice. Where The Hell Gandhi
Was ? Why He Didn't Saved Or Even Supported Him ? Again It Shows Just
For Power. Otherwise A person Who Loves Country And Just Fighting For
Freedom Would Have Loved To Save Such Great Man.
Followers
Have You ever
Seen Such Dual Personality Or Diplomatic person whose Follower Killed
Him ? It Can Only Happen When You Admire Someone For Being Great And
You Found He Is Nothing From Inside Same Happened With Gandhi. I hope
You All Know “Nathu Ram Godse” was A Great Follower Of Gandhi And
He Was Only one Who Killed Him. Isn't It Strange Or Gandhi Was Also
One Of Those Who Pretend To be Something else ?
Even In
Childhood Bhagat Singh Was His Follower But When He Realized What
Gandhi Is He Never followed Him. Because He Never deserves That
someone Should Follow Him.
Whom Got What
Those Who All
Really Did Sacrifices Got Nothing. Those Who Died Got Nothing. And
The Biggest Shame On Our Country Was Given By Congress By Terming
Bhagat Singh and His Group As Terrorist. I Am really Thankful To The
Judge Whose Verdict Gave Them Status Of “Shaeed”. Perhaps They
Died In The Best Way A Man Can. And On Other Hand Stupids Like Gandhi
And Nehru Got power. You Call Him “Father Of Nation Does It
Justifies” ? You Call Him “Mahatma” Was He Really ?
First Prime
Minister Was Made Nehru On Decision Of Gandhi Now Pls Dont Say Gandhi
Wasn't Supporting Him. And For Further Info Read
=>http://nehru-gandhi.blogspot.com/
What All
He Gave Us ?
He Gave us
Congress I Know he Never Formed It But Now At Top Leaders Like $onia
And Rahul Are Because Of Him And All Past Leaders And Again Read
Above Blog It's All About Them. Bhagat Singh Have Had A Vision About
Congress.
'The Congress
only wants power,
by hook or by
crook''
They aren't even
thinking about
what this
country really needs
''With their
way, nothing will change'' (White Will Go, Brown Will Come. But
Nothing Will Change)
''The rich will
get richer,
the poor will
become poorer''
And a time will
come when this
country will get
devoured by...
communal
passions. (One Day Time Will Come When People Will Fight On The Name
Of Religion And Casts. They Will Kill each Other And Our Many
Generations Have To Die To Correct This )
That is the
nightmare of the future
And Congress
Achieved This And Divided Country On Bases Of Religion. And So
Finally It Was All Given By Congress And Gandhi Of Course. Whatsoever
Congress Do Now Do Behind The Name Of Gandhi First He Fooled All And
Now They Are Fooling All On Name Of Gandhi And Now A Days What Cong
Is I hope All Know About It.
They Divided Our
Country In 2 Parts. And this division is eating us since very first
day. Kashmir Issue A very Big known Problem Was A gift Of Nehru
(Congress). 1000's Of Scams And Corruption. And Everyone Knows the
True face Of Cong Now.
At The End Of It
Do you Still Think He Was Or He Is A Hero ?